@matigo that's my point. You will have to draw the line somewhere and make the decision to trust something you didn't write because complete end-to-end control is nearly impossible.
@matigo just realize you're going to be making massive trade offs to get the level of control you want, including reinventing the wheel a-la 10Cv4. If you're ok with that, fine, but where does it end?
To be clear @matigo I sympathize with your plight. As an infosec professional I see a whole lot of untrustworthy computing/software out there. However, there is only so much I can realistically control end-to-end.
Let's cut to the chase @matigo: The reason you're looking at "Changing Platforms" comes down to control. You want you trust as little as possible of your computing experience to others.
It's laudable but I don't see how you can achieve it without degrading your computing experience to last century's "state of the art." Or living offline in a cave. ?
@height8 as long as they serve it with a shot of insulin, I'm right there with you. :P
@indigo At this point 10C is invite only and not growing astronomically. That probably helps with the pace a bit. Even when things "open up" a bit I suspect the growth will not be hyperbolic because no one involved will necessarily get any press and thus not a lot of attention. No one's expectations (users, developers) are inflated as a result.
// @matigo @sumudu @height8
@height8 Firefox has looked a bit listless for some time now, so the sentiments aren't all that surprising.
@streakmachine It does have a bit of a "this tall to ride" element to it, but once you find a theme that doesn't suck and get it all set up, it's pretty straightforward to use day-to-day.
// @matigo
@streakmachine This is why Jekyll is a wonderful thing. Wonderful in the sense that it gives you SOME way to minimize the amount of work involved in maintaining static HTML sites. :P
// @matigo
“Why is computer code patented and not copyrighted, then, if it’s speech? Can you patent speech?” — @adamcurry #noagenda 804