@larand "Calorie counting" assumes a couple things:
And it completely ignores the role of insulin, the master hormone that controls whether you are burning fat or storing fat. Because, guess what: you can't do both at the same time.
Weight Watchers, I mean WW CEO says they will “always be the best at the science of eating as healthy as you can, period.”
And yet, they still talk about points [washingtonpost.com], which is just another way to count calories. Which, anyone who's dieted knows doesn't work.
@matigo my goal is to get to about 86kg, which is where the BMI chart says I am merely "overweight." If I can get my waist/height ratio down to a 0.5 or less, that would also be good. To do that, I need to lose another 15cm (or 6 inches) around the waist.
// @JeremyCherfas
@matigo I'd like to get a bit closer to 89.6kg. Currently about 103kg…
// @JeremyCherfas
There's plenty of bad nutrition science & click-bait reporting of (conflicting) epidemiological studies as causative [nytimes.com]. No wonder we're all confused about what to eat.
In case you're wondering, Android is still horribly insecure, particularly if you're buying budget devices [bleepingcomputer.com]. The expensive devices are somewhat better, but I still prefer iOS from a security standpoint.
@whoisashygirl I'd be unbearable if I didn't have a job for 10 months :)
Hopefully it is profitable.