My soon-to-be ex is trying like hell to inflate my income in the court’s eyes so she can demand more money from me. There’s a word for that…

the original order was based on incomplete information about my financials and I have no idea how that can be considered reasonable per RCW 26.09.090 [app.leg.wa.gov].

Her request? I probably wouldn’t even be able to afford to live in my car.

matigo.ca.

I entirely reversed Type 2 Diabetes during my marriage to the Respondent, yet she’s now admitted in court documents to undergoing foot treatments related to diabetes, which I admit was news to me. And she has the audacity to ask for sole authority to make healthcare decisions for our daughter? Yeah, not if I have anything to say about it.

Apparently, the respondent thinks that 75% of my take-home pay isn't enough to maintain her status quo and wants more. Meanwhile, I'm not too far removed from living in my car if the courts don't reduce the existing order…

small naps also help. 🤪

variablepulserate.10centuries.org.

yeah…that wasn't obvious.

matigo.ca.

Hey how do you change your profile picture?

Last day of our last CPX 360 conference for the year. It's the EMEA version, which means I'm basically working the night shift tonight. Guess this is where my "unable to sleep properly" talent comes in handy. Well, that and coffee.

when she stole my work laptops and stuff from my car…yeah, I felt a restraining order was necessary. Problem is, the courts also put a restraining order on me. Not like I want anything to do with her.

matigo.ca.

hard to argue in front of the kids when I'm not talking to the respondent except through legal counsel, particularly given there's a restraining order in place. Also, not talking to the kids until the divorce is over, given my wife's penchant for using my son (at least) to phish me for information.

matigo.ca.